India practices a 'multi-alignment' approach in its cyber diplomacy. How does this posture strengthen India's internal security while maintaining strategic autonomy?
Main Body
India has reached SOET internet wise - vulnerable to increasing cyber attacks WEF Multi-alignment approach 1. Legislative - IT Act, 2000 2. Policy framework - Cyber security policy, 2013 3. Institutional - CCTNC - Tracking - NGIIPC, critical infrastructure - I4C - Coordination center 4. Trilun manual - Best practice - adoption policy
Internal security + strategic autonomy (1) Protecting critical infrastructure - Power, defence, banking (2) Tackle financial fraud - PATF (3) Manage cyber attacks - DDoS, spoofing, phishing (4) Better threat perception Issue: - Skill manpower deficit (15 million D) - Lack of private investment - Public investment < 1/4 of IT budget - Changing nature of attack - cluster, nuanced
Conclusion
Issue regarding skill manpower deficit, lack of private investment, and changing nature of cyber attacks
15 words
Diagram
Structured outline showing India's multi-alignment approach with four main pillars: Legislative (IT Act 2000), Policy framework (Cyber security policy 2013), Institutional (CCTNC with various sub-components), and Trilun manual
Kiran Kamate
Internal Security
Cyber Security and Diplomacy
Multi-alignment in cyber diplomacy
128
Total words
1
Paragraphs
Analytical and policy-focused
Tone