Critically analyse the impact of lateral entry into civil services on public service delivery.
Main Body
However, Criticism:- (1) Narrows scope of favoritism & nepotism in selection (2) Creates conflict of interest (3) Influential corporate benefit chosen over public welfare (4) Securing future prospects Measures => joint training programmes use of NQT platform for upskilling Skill based incentives Dual entry model 32-40 hrs + 37-40 hrs could be explored Hence, a balance between public welfare & efficiency needs to be maintained
However, Criticism:- (1) Narrows scope of favoritism & nepotism in selection (2) Creates conflict of interest => corporate benefit chosen over public welfare => securing future prospects (3) Creates a revolving door between public organizations & private sector which can lead to crony capitalism (4) Resistance from incumbent reduce morale officers (5) State limited span of tenure is ineffective for bringing out effective change Measures required: (1) Objectivity => methodology & focus on Validity of benchmark tests (2) Inclusivity => weightage systems wide range of parameters quantitatively (3) Alignment => educational & societal values Indian's shared culture creative acts Hence, higher education systems must need to be recaliberated. Expenditure on HEI should also have aligned vision
Conclusion
Hence, a balance between public welfare & efficiency needs to be maintained Hence, higher education systems must need to be recaliberated. Expenditure on HEI should also have aligned vision
29 words
SUVAN SHARMA
Role of Civil Services in a Democracy
Civil Service Reforms
Lateral Entry and Public Service Delivery
210
Total words
1
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone