KP

Komal Punia

Question Case Study 4GS4GS2

A smart city project is underway, and you have been appointed Head of Procurement. Before this assignment, you held a similar role in a major public-sector undertaking (PSU), where you earned a reputation for your tender drafting and vendor management skills. Given the smart city project's scale and significant procurement requirements, you seemed the perfect fit to lead the procurement section. A month ago, your section invited tenders for building supplies. Among the applicants was Mr. Sharma, a supplier you knew from your previous role at the PSU, where you earned a reputation. Mr. Sharma lived in your neighborhood, and your spouses were friends. Despite this personal connection, you have always maintained strict professional boundaries. Mr. Patel filed a formal complaint with the Department Seniors, providing evidence of your prior association with Mr. Sharma. As a result, an enquiry was initiated, and you were placed on compulsory leave pending its outcome. This situation left you questioning where you might have gone wrong despite your efforts to maintain professionalism.

Open scan (p.44)

Main Body

Case Study presented. Questions to follow.

6 words1 paragraphs

Topper

Komal Punia

Subject & Paper

GS4GS2

Topic

Role of Civil Services in a Democracy

Ethics and conflict of interest

Professional duties and personal relationships

Writing Stats

6

Total words

1

Paragraphs

case-study

Tone