Is it ethically justified to be devoted to duty at the cost of the personal safety of the staff? Explain your position with arguments.

Justification of deviation to duty at cost of safety of staff - Arguments in favour: A Jeremy Bentham's Utilitarianism - by compromising safety of few people for greater good for greater number. B To usher justice and democracy, by election officers need to do duty faithfully. Arguments against: B Rights Approach - can't compromise rights of staff B Compromising human lives is not the wise approach C Need to find alternative mechanism to perform duty without compromising safety D Safety of election staff is necessary to carry free & fair election & to maintain faith in election machinery.