Governors in India often overstep their constitutional role and fail to act effectively when needed. Comment. (Answer in 250 words)

Governors are executive appointments by president at the state as nominal heads under article 153. Governors overstepping their role - (1) To reserve bills for presidential suggestion over after being passed by state since for the second time (in case of Punjab) (2) To seek articles 356 and dissolve government at states both with different parties q seen in Jharkhand. (3) To charge the speech governor's address everywhere it has to be representative of q government's wish q - TN governor (4) To not allow majority party to form government and allow alternative q However assume - BJP led government formed oversight. (5) Using no bar effectively when needed - Fault and act effectively when needed

This solution while in -; (1) Adhering to Rajendra Trivedi case - governor but just appoint (2) Pushkar Sevade commission - suggests to have CM of the state's approval (3) To put reserve bills second time passed by state (SC in Punjab case) Governors are sageo that are omitted to ensure communication between the federal units, there have to be read as office of deputy.