Lok Adalats and Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms have improved access to justice but face limitations in delivering substantive justice. Discuss. (Answer in 250 words)

Lok Adalats and ADR help in resolution of incomparable offences, which was established by Act of 1987. Improved Accessors to Justice (1) Faster resolution - by non requirement of clamped pro cedures g Byrdherne set of 1882 (2) Resolution by Mediation - with cooperation and reduced requirement of furniture action - Negotiation in case of corporati disputes (3) Lack of penalties - during loan

adjudgment, by providing relaxation during ART (4) Reduce overloaded of prison (13.1% of its capacity as per Judicial Data grid) - by amicable resolution of dispute (5) Reduce delay - by reducing higher court burdening (State pendency) Limitation in delivering substantive justice (1) Underutilization of ADR - lack of genial mechanism availability (2) Limited access to lok Adalats - due to lack of infrastructure and lack of awareness among people (3) Lack of International Standards - with corporates preferring nations (eg Singapore hampering investment opportunity) (4) Paucity of formal mechanism - to appeal and ensure following of standard procedures for big term dispute resolution Higher clarification of offence as non-compulsible Marketing for civil case better enforcibility Awareness - Legal education and Legal Aid (Art 39 A) Use of Technology - for data management, ensure faster delivery, alternate mechanism provide useful of information