Examine the tension between the right to contest elections and the need to uphold electoral ethics under the Representation of the People Act. Should there be a lifetime ban on convicted criminals? (Answer in 250 words)
Introduction
Under Representation of People's Act in case of conviction of an member for 2ommune years his seat become immediately vacant. However as per ADR still 49% MPs have serious criminal cases pending before them.
34 words
Main Body
Under Representation of People's Act in case of conviction of an member for 2ommune years his seat become immediately vacant. However as per ADR still 49% MPs have serious criminal cases pending before them. Need for lifetime ban on convicted criminals: 1) Criminalisation of politics: Criminals entering politics erodes democratic values. 2) Muscle and Money power: Use of money by criminals to win elections. 3) Political Parties: Give importance to criminability instead of electoral ethics. 4) Issue of law: Criminals use powers for corruption and illegal business. 5) Influence on administration: Criminals in politics use influence, hampers investigations and criminal cases. 6) Public Trust: Criminalization of politics erode public trust and leads to lower voter turnout.
Conclusion
Banning criminals would reform electoral system and strengthen public trust. It would ensure better governance and others centralistic policy making.
20 words
Jayant Garg
Salient Features of the Representation of People's Act
Electoral Ethics and Disqualifications
Banning of Convicted Criminals
377
Total words
1
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone