Question 4GS2GS2
Discuss the role of the Freedom of Speech and Expansion of a citizen to share their ideas, opinions & beliefs. Compare the rights provided under Article 19(1)(a) to Article 105.
Main Body
Article 19(1)a provides for Freedom of Speech and expanding to its citizens to share their ideas, opinions & beliefs Article 105 provides for Parliamentary privilege where legislators have freedom of speech in parliament. Difference Fundamental right: Article 19(1)aRedressal of any breach by supreme court (Art 22).Scope is interpreted by supreme courtReasonable restrictions like university contempt of courtWith government legislation and
and Supreme court judgments, basic freedom of speech while parliamentary privilege framework is codifiedLess pendancy of misuse Maintain balance between parliamentary privilege and fundamental right 1) Ensure sanctity of parliament. 2) Parliamentarians also litigant of country thus should have certain reasonable restrictions. 3) Codification of privilegescan't be misused to curb political dissent. 4) Citizens should have freedom of speech to castigate parliament for its inactions There is urgent need for codification of parliamentary privileges to uphold democratic principle.
150 words1 paragraphs
Conclusion
There is urgent need for codification of parliamentary privileges to uphold democratic principle.
13 words
Diagram
Comparison table showing Fundamental right vs Parliamentary privilege with rows for Article 19(1)(a) and Article 105
Topper
Nidhi Goyal
AIR 912022
Subject & Paper
GS2GS2
Topic
Indian Constitution - Historical Underpinnings, Evolution, Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions and Basic Structure
Fundamental Rights
Freedom of Speech and Expression Article 19(1)(a) vs Article 105
Writing Stats
163
Total words
1
Paragraphs
comparative
Tone