S.R. Bommai v. Union of India signified a paradigm shift in the judicial interpretation of the union's authority to assume control of a state's administration. In this context discuss the significance and impact of the judgement on cementing the federal structure.
Introduction
S.R. Bommai case, 1994 laid a strong foundation for federalism in the country.
13 words
Main Body
Article 356 i.e. President's rule cannot be issued arbitrarily by the government. The President's satisfaction is subject to judicial review. SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDGEMENT In case of hung assembly, Article 356 can be used only if the situation is grave and is beyond correction by the state government. In case of hung assembly, the Article 356 can be issued. Governor must conduct a floor test before a new government is formed.
Prevented misuse of Article 356 [Diagram showing 'Impact of Judgement' with branches:] - Governors get the framework for floor test - Ensured stability of state government - Strengthened cooperative federalism Thus, S.R. Bommai judgement played a significant role in limiting the union's authority to assume control of a state's administration.
Conclusion
Thus, S.R. Bommai judgement played a significant role in limiting the union's authority to assume control of a state's administration.
20 words
Diagram
Flow chart showing Impact of Judgement with three branches: governors' framework for floor test, state government stability, and strengthened cooperative federalism
RUHANI
Federal Structure - Functions, Responsibilities, Devolution of Powers and Finances
Federalism
S.R. Bommai Case and Federal Structure
153
Total words
1
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone