The United States and India have their own distinctive jurisprudence of freedom of speech and expression despite the similarities in constitutional provisions. Analyse.
Main Body
US, world's oldest democracy and India, world's largest democracy have areas of convergence and divergence in implementing freedom of speech and expression. Similarities in constitutional provisions (1) Freedom of speech and expression ensured (2) Independent Judiciary to deliver those laws (3) Court history as source of privilege (4) Rule of law upheld (5) due process of law established (6) ensure courts deliver complete justice Despite the similarities, there are forms of Divergence
INDIA / US (1) Conservative - ex burning of flag not allowed / (1) Liberal - burning of flag allowed (2) Sedition (Art 124A) still there / (2) No Sedition law (3) Contempt of any court against judges / (3) allowed to criticise judges on individual level (4) jury system absent / (4) jury decides cases (5) single law to deliver justice / (5) different class and central law (6) Advisory jurisdiction / (6) Not have
Conclusion
Thus, both nations have points of consequence and divergence based on local needs and historical facts.
16 words
MEDHA ANAND
Comparison of Indian Constitutional Scheme with Other Countries
Secularism in India and USA
Secularism in India and USA
164
Total words
1
Paragraphs
comparative
Tone