KM

Kush MotwaniAIR 11· 2023

Question Q-2GS2GS2

Electoral bonds are a double-edged sword, proving anonymity to donors while raising concerns around transparency. To what extent have electoral bonds furthered legitimized opacity in electoral funding?

Open scan (p.7)

Main Body

Electoral bonds are [[non-Interest bearing]] [[promissory notes]], introduced by Finance Act 2017, to ensure political funding is not dare using black money. In this context: © Transparency concerns of electoral bonds: 1. Bonds carry no ownership internumer. 2. Political party - [unclear] has no cancellation in disclose name of donor 3. Donor - no compulsion to disclose 4. If donor is a separate entity - no listing, no disclosure required. 5. Violates citizens' 'might be information', assess their representatives 6. Relevant concerns about foreign inter-ference vs corporate entities.

designated SBI bond brands ↓ SBI issued a PSU board - govt may have information about all donors ↓ [[information asymmetry, lack of level playing field]] In the same hire, may have increased homoparenting: 1. [FYCE] necessary to buy [[bonds]], bonds. 2. Have to be purchased digitally (ie, money is transferred digitally) it can be traced ↓ ensure black money does not come into political system. 3. Preserves privacy of donors. 4. SBI would maintain identity of all buyers for investigation later, if needed. Mechanics: 1. Would have of black money has been addressed with of premise security skill exam. 2. [[Concern of foreign interference has been voiced by election commission in CC]]. 3. Need to balance privacy and transparency. Way forward: - [[VOUNTARY DISCLOSURE]] (S5) by Sushakhand party [[IMM-received no for bonds from India]].

Question of gender equality is central to debate on UCE. What are the challenges in secularizing UCE with gender equality as enshrined in the constitution? The Uniform Civil Code (Article 44) is referred to as the "unfulfilled dream of the nation's founding fathers". Legislator equality is ensured in Articles 15-16 of the constitution. (and also Article 51, 56 etc.) Gender equality central to debate on UCE. 1. UCE deals with uniform personal laws (marriage, divorce, adoption, maintenance, inheritance, etc. - issues 2. India being a largely patriarchal society, personal law is bound against women. - More head 3. Examples: Hindu law - Female Hindu laws - maintaining of nd wife - differing age of marriage for boys and girls (14 and 18 respectively). 4. Hindu women did not have right to property before codification of Hindu laws.

5. Marital law are still even codified & disproportionately biased against women Challenged in re-reconciling gender equality and UCE: 1. Articles 15 & 16Article 16 gives religious demarcation freedom to manage religious affairsits has been interpreted by courts and legal experts to mean that personal laws are not subject to judicial review. 2. Lack of codification of all laws 3. State interpreted in personal mattersagainst principle of liberty 4. Implementation laws: constitutional morality vs public morality 5. Way forward: 1. [[immediate verification]] of all personal laws 2. Codification will allow us to understand the extent of gender inequality 3. They will then enable the state to take appropriate steps across all religions.
478 words1 paragraphs

Topper

Kush Motwani

AIR 112023

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Salient Features of the Representation of People's Act

Elections

Electoral Bonds and Transparency

Writing Stats

478

Total words

1

Paragraphs