Examine the statement that allowing the Constitution to embrace 'ceremonial' activism can merge into a 'Frankenstein's monster'. Critically examine.
Introduction
If allowed to unleash what instant, judicial activism can emerge into a Frankenstein's 'monster'.
14 words
Main Body
PSR of UNDERMINING BALANCE OF POWER (1) Constitution - distinct separation Article 50 (Judging & Judiciary) (Judiciary and legislature) (2) Judiciary as third chamber (U' NRRS) against cost Distant spirit & morally. - (Manaj Naruiti Case) (3) Public faith and credibility at court due to excessive domain -> politiced proceedings. By Sathram Court passed Tags with state & pandamic. (4) Allegation of disappearing of power. By J. Mensional Spirits. Speech. From a constitutional court into the Executive court -> By Gautam Bhataiya sub Article 32 (6) Publicity in Honest lying giving wise ties for increased sacking - By 5 crore in HC & subzqinatu B Over zealous judiciary leads to a politicised judiciary - -> Chief Stagging Pakistan. (6) From court of law to court of personal opinion. By Stastrani Chaukhashi case - national coalition in Chams hull. WAY FORWARD: Preserving the balance SC in Brahmaji Chaturkar vs Sate & Uttrakhand: (1) Only for growing public interest, and no private interest strictly. (2) Judge should observe caution to set legislation since (let In re: Migrant labours) (3) Public faith and trust depend, on accessibilit) & The court.
Conclusion
Constitutional courts are De-Politicised public must preserve distinct balance.
9 words
VANAJ VIDYAN
Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups
Public Interest Litigation
Judicial Activism
280
Total words
1
Paragraphs
1
Bullets
formal
Tone