While rankings aim to benchmark the performance of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), concerns remain about whether current ranking frameworks reflect the broader goals of education. Suggest measures to make the ranking system more objective, inclusive, and aligned with educational and societal outcomes.

Ranking of Higher Education Institutions METS reflects their relative performance and promotes them to increase their quality of education in the spirit of competitiveness. Concerns about current ranking framework: (1) Lack of inclusive paremeters. Western countries institute have high class infra, while regional institute lack such infra, but scaled on some parameters. (2) Rigid approach of ranking having limited factors to consider result in ineffective ranking.

Measures to make ranking system more objective, inclusive ad aligned with societal outcome: (4) Ranking based on new-societal parameters linked with infrastructure and other regional index. (1) Based on quality of outcome rather then procedural capability. (5) Ranking should consider country's with per capita income, cultural ethos

so that qualitative framework to compare her can be derived. New parameters like foreground scholarships, targeted outreach activities, innovation solving regional problem and model also be considered. As recommended by NEP 2020, inform in HETIs as well as the overall ranking framework is much neede to create inclusive comparative parameters for broad goals of education.