The Lokpal Act aimed to establish an institution that would act as a deterrent against corruption. However, the actual impact of the Lokpal has fallen short of expectations. Assess the reasons behind the underwhelming performance of the Lokpal and propose strategies to strengthen its functioning.

REASONS FOR UNDERWHELMING PERFORMANCE: i Lokpal does not have suo moto powers to look into the acts of corruption. ii Limited time period of 7 years is provided for complaints regarding corruption. iii Huge punishment is imposed on false and frivolous complaints which deters whistle blowers. iv Delay in appointment: Lokpal has vacancy and vacancy of two judicial members. v Legal assistance is provided to public servant. vi Its recommendation are advisory and not binding. vii Matters dealing with Prime Minister are guidelines vague. viii No effective immunity provided to whistleblowers. ix Prosecution rate is less. Almost 88% cases were dismissed off without any action. MEASURES TO STRENGTHEN: i Recommendations to be made binding. ii suo moto power must be granted. iii Timely appointments can improve efficacy. Conclusion text continues on next page.

Data is a crucial body which can check corruption hindering the development. More autonomy and power to local would truly make a difference.