Subordination of investigative agencies to the executive is fraught with disastrous consequences. Discuss the statement in light of the evolution of the Central Bureau of Investigation and its 'caged parrot'.

Subordination of Investigation agencies - By executive as its consequence Privatization of Investigation agencies: (1) In Appointments i placing/Appointing persons with Vested interest ii prospective of post retirement employ must for office holder deducting their Independence (2) To Privatigete politically motivated charge: ii Using enforcement directorate against opposition leaders and political members belonging to regional parties a CBI and ED raids in members of opposition Consequences: (1) promoting Vested interest and Sovereignty Independence at investigative agencies a Elongation of tenure of CBI director (2) Undermines Federal principles as true agencies were used against State political body members b It determines federal principles (3) promote Rule of men >Rule of law Agency. (4) affects Individual Liberty and Freedom - as concentrated in of Vested prejudized details investigation at other criminal delayed justice (5) district centre-state relation: - Around state has already Kilkitrawnn General consent given to CBI which In turn due auditor future Investigation in particular state b it requires case by case approval Recently Tamilnadu Withdrawal (6) loss of Credibility and public trust on Investigation agencies on long run. Vibrancy of Investigative agencies should be maintained For effective access to Justice Under Suspwell Tripathi case Supreme Court observed . Their subordination of executive should be done away to ensure Independence