Lateral entry into civil services is seen as a reformative step, yet it continues to attract criticism and controversy. Discuss.
Main Body
The lateral entry notification by UPSC in 2024 for Third Secretary positions was taken down for eruption of controversy. Reformative Step: Enclay of speciality in General/ Civil Services. Private Sector Efficiency, Experience could be published. Lateral entry test and intensive training. As Fali S. Nariman remarked: Judicial Accountability is the hallmark of a well functioning democracy.
But attacks controversy due to: 1) A step to avoid Bureaucratisation. 2) Bureaucrats established environment and promotion based powers. 3) Outside insider perspective. 4) Private sector experiences could be difficult to implement in diverse media. Conclusion: Bureaucratic-Lateral entry, Political concerns, Capacity Building of lateral entry via Merrougli.
Conclusion
Bureaucratic-Lateral entry, Political concerns, Capacity Building of lateral entry via Merrougli.
11 words
Diagram
Diagram showing reformative step with three branches: Large pool of talented private sector applicants, saves cost of recruitment, and lateral entry points to (1) Entry of speciality in General/Civil Services, (2) Private Sector efficiency and experience could be published in brief, (3) Intensive training and intensive training.
MADHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Role of Civil Services in a Democracy
Lateral Entry and Civil Service Reforms
Civil Service Recruitment Mechanisms
114
Total words
1
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone