Frequent reliance on the ordinance making power by the government, not only dilutes the basic tenets of executive accountability in a parliamentary democracy, but also overlooks the democratic traditions of the legislature. Discuss with relevant examples.

Promulgation of Ordinance is in the power of executive to bring a law through Order of President/Governor when either one of the house is not in session. Their frequency of usage has increased both in Parliament and State legislatures. (1) Overseeing judicial keys by bringing on ordinance for Delhi service Authority to manage range of officers (2) Reforms for State sector were also bought by an ordinance All three leads to injustice outcomes - Dictate accountability of executive: as the ordinance drawn individually till the person is called indiscussed till the reason is called Today's today has itself reduced. (2) Demersal balance oralised: (2a) No thought defunct on the effect of the bill (1a) Lost opportunity to direct like to starting committee of houses (1.3) Against the idea of constitutionalism when separately promulgated

Several states issue Mr & OP diluted the labour laws though used ordinance which barred rights of labourers. All these leads to unjustice outcomes: (1) Dictate accountability of executive: as the ordinance drawn individually till the person is called indiscussed till the reason is called Today's today has itself reduced. (1.2) Lost opportunity to direct like to starting committee of houses (1.3) Against the idea of constitutionalism when separately promulgated Supreme Court Rode: held in DC Waddwad case PEE Cooper case that ordinance making power: is subject to judicial review & it has been re-promulgated again (as seen in Bihar). The idea must be to use ordinances only in URGENCY and disclose the name in Preamble of the bill for a healthy parliamentary practice