What is the rationale behind the 'three-language formula' in India's education policy? Also highlight the challenges associated with its adoption and implementation across the country.
Main Body
Kothari Commission in 1966 1st recommended adopting 3-language formula to teach students 3 language with 2 Indian language. Rationale: NEP 2020 proper formula for linguistic diversity and National integration. Academic and equitative benefit: alignment with SDG-4 shows benefit to equitable multi-lingual student education. Ensure alignment with Article 350A of Constitution (Primary education in mother tongue). Tribal language have given space.
Challenges associated: 1) Linguistic imposition (Federal Tension) - MH opposition by various section. 2) Policy ambiguity: no national consensus on which 3 languages to adopt. 3) Academic loss: focus on 3 languages could distract focus on one subject. 4) Conflict with NEP FLORUIT Clause - regional language vis Mothertongue. 5) Infrastructure constraints: 10 lakh teacher vacancy (NTH Aapad). 6) RTE Act 2009 uniform implementation. Education Vision could guide to linguistic, justice and equitable education.
Diagram
Mind map showing Rationale connected to NEP 2020 formula for linguistic diversity and National integration, Academic and equitative benefit, and alignment with SDG-4
MADHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Indian Constitution - Historical Underpinnings, Evolution, Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions and Basic Structure
Significant Provisions
Language Policy and Education
134
Total words
1
Paragraphs