KA

KRUPA A JAINAIR 190· 2025

Question Q.18Suggest measures to make the ranking system more objective, inclusive, and aligned with educational and societal outcomesGS2GS2

While rankings aim to benchmark the performance of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), concerns remain about whether current ranking frameworks reflect the broader goals of education. Suggest measures to make the ranking system more objective, inclusive, and aligned with educational and societal outcomes.

Open scan (p.43)

Main Body

World QS Ranking system, 2025 had about 80 Indian educational institutions among top 500 as against earlier 2014 report where only 7 institutions were there. Various ranking systems in India is NIRF ranking, AICTE ranking, ICDBE ranking Concerns about ranking framework: (1) Lack of focus on diversity in institutions about major focus on students in total - women (2) Less undergraduate metric on measurably and its outcomes and more on infrastructure (3) Subjectivity no post filled by few students & teachers (4) Ranking CNIRP based on outcomes like placements but not on teacher attendance & teacher education/qualifications

5Rankings donot consider - Affordability & Accessibility of Higher Education Institution (2) Ranking system ignore all institutions, law institutions, commerce institutions CNHR unless then (3) Collusion of title with accreditation system for better ranking Measures to make ranking system More objectives: (1) More objectives - larger data sets - d all year of students, alumni, teachers (2) AI data analytics to check for performance based on metrics (3) Digital surveys and polls to being and avoid subjectivity (4) More inclusive: (1) Ranking for all institutions - low commune literature for PvDs & Affordability for poor inclusion (5) Teachers performance also as a metric Aligned with educational & social outcomes: (1) Curriculum analysis of based on market need - then better (2) Women representation in HER to represent social equity (3) Industry academic linkage with HER - to depict fitter by enjoys with RVCE (5) Foreign standards match by an educational levels by FoE, VdJRA scheme

by quality education (8) Learning outcomes as metric measures through Researched outcome - IPR rather than infrastructure only (4) aligned with educational & social outcomes (1) Curriculum analysis of based on market need - then better (2) Women representation in HER to represent social equity (3) Industry academic linkage with HER - to depict fitter by enjoys with RVCE (9) Foreign standards match by an educational levels by FoE, VdJRA scheme Way Forward HEIs with good draining should act as Buddy mentor institution for other smaller HEIs

340 words1 paragraphs

Conclusion

Way Forward HEIs with good draining should act as Buddy mentor institution for other smaller HEIs

16 words

Topper

KRUPA A JAIN

AIR 1902025Unknown

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Education

Higher Education Rankings

HEI Ranking Frameworks and Concerns

Writing Stats

356

Total words

1

Paragraphs

analytical

Tone