Why does the Constitution not provide for a conclusive say to the State Legislative Assemblies in the creation, bifurcation, or dissolution of a State?
Introduction
As per Article 1, India is a Union of States i.e. states in India do not have right to cede from India and that right lies with centre.
28 words
Main Body
As per Article 1, India is a Union of States i.e. states in India do not have right to cede from India and that right lies with centre. * why states have no conclusive say in creation bifurcation etc of state * (1) Founding Fathers of constitution thought that this would result in blueprint for balkanisation (2) Strong centre was necessary for efficient administration and hence rights of states needed to be curbed. (3) Giving conclusive say to assemblies will enhance politicization of already existing issues like Khalistan, Kashmir, Bodo Jans, etc
Conclusion
Hence, we see that states do not have a conclusive say in their creation, dissolution and the imbalance is in hinges with government of India where we are aware that India is quasi-federal.
33 words
BACHHAV KARTIK RAVINDRA
Federal Structure
Federal Structure Challenges
Constitutional provisions for creation, bifurcation and dissolution of states
273
Total words
1
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone