India has roughly 550 million internet users, the 2nd largest global user base, as per TRAI.

Demand for stricter regulation:

i) To prevent radicalization and hate speech, cautioned in [Amithi Morgan] case

ii) Uphold national security and sovereignty.

(b) Cartel recruitment by terrorist groups

iii) Ensure privacy of people, as per [Puttaswamy case].

iv) Notice children from harmful content.

(b) Pornography

v) Protect women from online trolling, doxxing etc as per [Joseph Shine case].

vi) Also necessary for environmental protection – Chat GPT can be a (0x) example there a Google search = since aligns with [M.C Mehta case].

but regulation poses a threat to freedom of speech an expression

Delogging, dumping, excessive buying as per Joseph Steve case. Also necessary for environmental protection - ChatGPT can be 0x example since aligns with MC Mehta case. Ear regulation poses a threat to freedom of speech and expression.

Direct challenge in Harikela khim case that provides fight to internet.

Similarly against Yakeema Sharif case as online access part of right to life.

No internet = less employment that violates judgement under Olga case.

It challenges continuous access to