Question Q.12 (final notes)GS4GS2
Justification and additional considerations for the Municipal Commissioner's course of action
Main Body
Justification for the approach:
Duty to Constitution: As a civil servant, oath binds me to uphold law and public welfare.
Rule of Law: No one is above law – not even builder's political connections.
Public Interest: Deaths demand accountability; cover-up would compound injustice.
Professional Ethics: Accepting bribe destroys credibility and encourages corruption.
Long-term consequences: Precedent would embolden future violations.
Transparency: Public deserves honest investigation and accountability.
Protecting self: Documenting threat protects against false SC/ST complaint.
Additional measures:
Request transfer if necessary to ensure impartiality
Involve civil society and media for transparency
Strengthen inspection mechanisms
Implement stricter penalties for violations
Create whistleblower protection mechanisms
Ensure compensation fund for workers' families
Revoke builder's licenses for future projects
Public accountability of all officials involved
136 words4 paragraphs15 bullet points
Conclusion
Despite immense pressure and threats, adhering to ethical principles protects both the system and the officer's integrity. The cost of compromise far exceeds the temporary discomfort of taking the right stand.
31 words
Examiner score
1.4/10Open original scan
Page 55
Topper
Gaurav Kumar
AIR 3772025
Subject & Paper
GS4GS2
Topic
Role of Civil Services in a Democracy
Administrative ethics and public accountability
Writing Stats
167
Total words
4
Paragraphs
15
Bullets
formal and principled
Tone