Main Body
i) Union finance commisioner consider calciain cartcias and accalcalion state share based on-therm.
(eg) ISFc gave entire 19% share.
iii) Already apvsed scheme also differentiate for state.
(Concems raised)
(I) Over emphasis on population under Indian state acts for more share against norther states based on their popualtion effect.
(B) Lack of debate with all states have raised demand demands and Others state have asked for it.
(E) Over emphasis on derived and discretionary grant rather State stated grants.
State (coordinated Measure) commision Insure transters for developer.
Open original scan
Page 33
Garv Garg
Federal Structure - Functions, Responsibilities, Devolution of Powers and Finances
Centre-State Financial Relations
Vertical and Horizontal Devolution of Taxes
108
Total words
1
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone