DS

DEVANSH SARSWATAIR 221· 2025

Question Q.13GS2GS2

Describe the various mechanisms available for the resolution of disputes concerning the use, distribution or control of inter-state waters. Also, state the reasons for their limited success.

Open scan (p.29)

Introduction

Inter-state water disputes are a serious challenge to cooperative federalism as is evident in the ongoing dispute of Cauvery water sharing.

21 words

Main Body

Inter-state water disputes are a serious challenge to cooperative federalism as is evident in the ongoing dispute of Cauvery water sharing.

Inter-state Water Disputes:

Water - Inter State Dispute Resolution under the Constitution
Dispute under Art. 262 lay way of a law by Parliament
Jurisdiction of supreme Court under Article 131 is based

Mechanism for dispute resolution:

1. Constitutional - under Art.262, the central government can constitute 'Inter-State Water Disputes Act'

2. Statutory - River Boards Act - Parliament can constitute river boards to regulate water issue

3. Writ Petition by affected citizens - eg. Ranga Reddy Residents welfare case in Supreme Court

4. Voluntary Measures - by Negotiation, mediation, good offices

5. Other - Inter-state Council under Art.263

to decide such disputes eg. Cauvery tribunal, Acharya tribunal

2. Statutory: River Boards Act - Parliament can constitute river boards to regulate water issue

3. Writ Petition by affected citizens - eg. Ranga Reddy Residents welfare case in Supreme Court

4. Voluntary Measures - by Negotiation, mediation, good offices

5. Other - Inter-state Council under Art.263

Reasons for limited success:

1. Significant delays eg. Godavari tribunal took 11 years to give judgment

2. Politicisation of water and related issues as in Cauvery

3. Delay in constituting tribunal

4. Appellate jurisdiction of supreme court against award of tribunal, eg. Sutlez dispute Punjab and Haryana

5. Non-implementation and contempt of tribunal's award eg. Sutlez dispute Punjab and Haryana

6. Lack of cooperation and heightened animosity between state

7. Regional identity invocation to direct attention

Way Forward:

1. Conservation of water and conservative agricultural practices (Mitti Shai Farmed)

2. Permanent tribunal to adjudicate disputes in time bound manner

3. Contempt powers to tribunal

4. Wider stakeholder involvement - NGOs, farmer groups, media, political leaders etc.

This can endue a consensus led approach on successful lines as done in Vienna airport dispute.

310 words5 paragraphs3 bullet points

Conclusion

This can endue a consensus led approach on successful lines as done in Vienna airport dispute.

16 words

Diagram

Flow diagram showing Inter-state Water Disputes Resolution mechanisms including Constitutional and Statutory provisions

Examiner score
1.3/10

Open original scan

Page 29

Topper

DEVANSH SARSWAT

AIR 2212025

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Federal Structure - Functions, Responsibilities, Devolution of Powers and Finances

Federal Structure Challenges

Inter-state Water Disputes

Writing Stats

347

Total words

5

Paragraphs

3

Bullets

analytical

Tone