Critically examine the 'in-house procedure' adopted by the Apex Court to inquire into allegations of misconduct against judges of constitutional courts in India.

(B) Reasonaable restriction - Article 19(2) is one of them is Public Morality

Thus, Balancing Social morality and freedom of speech and expression is the way forward for maintaining a free and open society,

'In house procedure' refers to the procedure followed up Apex Court, involving judicial scrutiny against misconduct of Judge.

Procedure: (I) Either with SER male or with secondhand statement by Respondent, CJI initiates an enquiring

Procedure: (B) Justices of High Court and out member Judge of High Court are part of committee formed by CJI (2) The committee is not bound on judicial process must give opportunity to the concerned accused Judge for clarification

Merits of in House Procedure:

(I) Independence and Autonomy of Judiciary is involvement of Judicial members

Demerits of in House Procedure:

(I) lack of accountablility and transparent is a genuine matter of enquiry

(B) Potential role of partisanism and compromise is leading to violation of Principle of natural Justice

Against Global precedence (B) UK, new Enquire process for removal of Judge and enquire.

(I) Inclusion of non Judicial member

(B) Reports of enquiry to be publicly disclosed