The Supreme Court, in a recent verdict, prescribed a time period for the Governor's assent to state legislative bills. What are the implications of this judgment for cooperative federalism and legislative accountability in India? (Answer in 150 words)

SC has recently assorted time limit an Governor's assent to reduce the misuse of Article 200 and make Governor a 'bridge' between centre and state.

A200 - "as soon as reasonable" - not subjective

SC Verdict:

Implications an co-operative federalism:

@ Ensure agencies - with state.

@ Recent in governor delayed 12 Bills

@ Increase state autonomy - (63) - Kerala take-ayette, Jack.

@ Increase LG-ordinance an co-ordination

Legislative accountability:

@ enhance 'constitutional punctuality' in governance

@ reduce "obstructionism" due to governor by political party

@ In line with Nelam Related discretion not sally the prerogative of govern

[Continuation from page 8]

to be used with desirability.

Federal Net safeguards:

@ Ensure Sarbarta transmitted

recommendation of justice in discretion making

Legislative accountability:

@ enhance 'constitutional punctuality' in governance

@ reduce "obstructionism" use due of governor by political party

@ In line with Nelam Related discretion not sally the prerogative of govern - to be used with desirability.

Judgement has to be supplemented with sarkaste/Fundame recommendations and legal accountability with a new Act.