As the project manager, Ramesh has the following options:

(I) Maintain professional silence and not value any delay and attract political wrath.

(II) Leverage social media and become a whistleblower by publicly telling the design flaw.

(III) Persuade the minister to not overlook the flaw as it runs lucid to public disaster.

(IV) File a complaint regarding corruption over news of undue influence with habayuki.

(V) Demand a 3rd party audit to have neutral assessment of project.

(VI) Ramesh can redesign to safeguard interest and prevent undesired effect (Dwayaward safasumar).

Ethical Dilemmas:

(i) Professional Integrity vs personal conscience

(ii) Public duty vs duty towards seniors (including ministers)

(iii) Delay of project viewing about public disappointment vs delay term public safety with.

(iv) Traffic congestion quick solution vs traffic died accident in darker time

(v) Personal job safety vs Welfare of citizens

The well develop a circle of innocence in Ramesh.

Professional challenge | Response

(I) Apathy of officials and ignorant attitude | Shaw persistence in achieving

(II) Transfer of Ramesh to avoid any headache | And have unwavering lawyer to support the issue (to IGP/CNA) from letters dispatched

(III) Political pressure by undue influence on Ramesh | Leverage civil society and citizens) help to complify voice

(IV) Using e-governance to send proposal and transparency

(V) 3rd party evaluation and audits (key citizens)

Ramesh has to uphold the value of selflessness, courage and fortitude as Mahatma Gandhi said - 'Time is always Right for a cause that is JUST'.

Professional challenge continued...

Ramesh has to uphold the value of selflessness, courage and fortitude as Mahatma Gandhi said - 'Time is always Right for a cause that is JUST'.

Srushti case involves a reflection of the problem of 'dual burden' that a woman faces due to personal and professional constraints.

The case is a reflection of the problem of 'dual burden' that a women faces due to personal and professional constraints.

Ethical Issues:

(i) 'Mother Track' (Japanese concept) - where potential mother gets sidetracked in work due to maternity leave

(ii) Gender Inequality - unequal burden and expectation from women.

(iii Srushti's role as a mother - focused more than often (helicopter parenting)

(iv) Hectic work - lifelines disbalance work life balance for women.

(V) Mental health stress due to Burnout

(VI) Inflexible working environment - insensitive to needs of a mother

(VII) Responsibility diffusion - Srushti felt as a mother equally important

(iii) Hectic work - disbalance work life balance for women.

(IV) Mental health stress due to Burnout

(VI) Inflexible working environment - insensitive to needs of a mother

(VII) Responsibility diffusion - Srushti felt as a mother equally important.

(VIII) Gender Bias - of women's capacity - especially physical duty (can't field)

(IX) Back of support and care - from family and husband after child parenting - affects children upbringing due to ignorance

(X) Child parenting - affects children upbringing due to ignorance (helicopter parenting)

b) Options Available:

(I) Resign from IAS (Merit) - Temporary benefit to all

(II) Take maternal / paternal leave extension for taking care of child (Merit) - Doesn't resolve bigger issue

(III) Open dialogue with Arjun and Senior at workplace for a flexible work-life balance (Merit) - Large term and sustainable solution

(c) Options Available:

(I) Family time increased

(II) Child care

(II) Against the conscience of Srushti

(III) Shows exception and moral weakness

(Merit) - Temporary benefit to all

(Demerit) - Does not resolve bigger issue; Career strick (curvative situation in district)

(Merit) - Large term and sustainable solution

(Demerit) - Charge with take time and ignorance of request

Suggestions:

(I) Family time increased

(II) Child care

(III) Against the conscience of Srushti

(IV) Shows exception and moral weakness