Main Body
Judicial interventions:
(a) Setting Timelimp - State of Punjab/Tamil Nadu case: SC has given 1-3 month timeframe to state act upon the verses and reserve for president. Restricted veto of A-200.
(b) Per under Judicial Review - Rameshwar Prasad case - governors power and discretion can be reviewed
(c) Curtails A-326 - In SR Bommai case, B76 to be used in rare cases with consent of chief minister
(d) Appointment to be neutral - NDean Rabat case - Politically neutral back ground needed to achieve conflict of interest
(e) Enhance collaboration with Council of Ministers - In the case Sammer Singh vs Urban water - ARTICLE 163 - Broadened with aid and advice of Corn as compulsory.
(f) Floor test - SC was declared necessary to prove majority in Shuryg Singh vs speaker as MP case. However, this has to be further supplemented with:
Legal charges in Article 200, executive and political will, pro-active judicial action against any act against constitution, Public awareness
Supplement with:
Conclusion
Floor test - SC declared necessary to prove majority in Shuryg Singh is speaker MP case. However, this has to be further supplemented with legal charges in Article 200, executive and political will, pro-active judicial action against any act against constitution, public awareness Judiciary has set a precedent that legislature must follow to enduring Gandhi's ideal of 50+2c=49
58 words
Deeksha Chourasiya
Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups
Judiciary
Judicial review and constitutional limits on gubernatorial powers
246
Total words
3
Paragraphs