Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) are pivotal to inclusive and efficient urban governance, yet they remain fiscally constrained and institutionally weak. Analyze.
Main Body
"A nation is as strong as it is state" And the state is as strong as it's local bodies. Principle of subsidiarity was reestablished in 74th amendment act (1992)
Urban local bodies yet face (fiscal), (functional) and (functional) problems - a due
Fiscal problems:
1. Inadequate revenue
Only 1-5% of revenue from own tax collection, most of it from state/central grants.
2. Tied grants is central sector scheme reduces fiscal capacity
3. Lack of fiscal devolution - a state have disbursed
full revenue to ULBs (CAG report)
Institutionally weak:
1. Delayed elections to ULB
2. Chandigarh election fraud
3. No uniform standards across the states for ULBs.
4. Functionaries - politicised and not based on merit
5. West Bengal Mayor election violence his parties
6. Untrained staff - urban planning not taught to officials (German model)
ULBs fiscal revival - the people
Interventions needed:
Institutional:
1. Activity mapping (CAD/APC)
2. Training & official within PM model (Custom Ahmedabad & Nashera ULB)
3. Standard SOP's and accountability
4. Bengaluru citizen report card
Fiscal growth:
1. Municipal Bond market to be developed
2. Indore
3. Increase revenue with property tax (land assessment)
4. CSR funds for cities
Myasm declaration principles along with SRA ARC recommendations are needed is ensure sustainable cities (CSDA-1 I)
Conclusion
Myasm declaration principles along with SRA ARC recommendations are needed to ensure sustainable cities (CSDA-II)
15 words
Diagram
Flow chart showing ULBs fiscal revival leading to three functions: water/housing and sanitation, democratic decentralization, and reduction of state/central burden
DEEKSHA CHOURASIYA
Federal Structure - Functions, Responsibilities, Devolution of Powers and Finances
Local Self Government
Urban Local Bodies - Fiscal and Functional Constraints
240
Total words
13
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone