BJ

BHOOMIKA JAINAIR 331· 2025

Question Q.15Critically examineGS2GS2

Critically examine the 'in-house procedure' adopted by the Apex Court to inquire into allegations of misconduct against judges of constitutional courts in India.

Open scan (p.33)

Main Body

The recent initiation of 'in-house inquiry' against a sitting HC judge forumcounted g cash in his name has sparked debate.

In-house inquiring mechanism :-

1Y against a sitting HC judge - CJI + Chief Justice of HC and other such SC judges to inquire.
2Y against SC judge = CJI + Chief Justice by arrest 2 ACs.
3Y against HC - Chief Justice + Chief Justice of 2 HCs.

Appeal to parliament to initiate

Drawings with the system :-

1No principle of natural justice - Judge inquiring judges.
2Lack of transparency = sealed room proceedings
3Discretionary powers to judge
4Against presumptions for equality
5Alleged conflict of interest
6Slew nature of inquiry
7Duale of expletive of investigation under Apex court of agencies, not judges
8Rise of bias for colleague
9No clear guideline of procedure - assum atty
10case against Parliamentary power to initiate removal proceedings (Article 124)
11Black-box nature = non-transparency

Yet it is important since :-

1Bar on Parliament to discuss

conduct of judges - constitutional provision] Article (12.2.

2Upholding dignity of office
3Taint on judiciary for independent finding
4Uphold Article 50 = separation of Senate and Judiciary
5Prevent weaponization of misconduct
6Prevent ease amongst judges

How to reform procedure :-

Independent inquiry along with independent members
Predacious disclosure of findings
Supportioning inquiry through State Agencies
Bringing precise under RTE (Criminal Appeal case CJI (Criminal Caul under RTE)

This would help in upholding public conviction, i.e. Judiciary.

261 words12 paragraphs

Conclusion

This would help in upholding public conviction, i.e. Judiciary.

9 words

Topper

BHOOMIKA JAIN

AIR 3312025

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups

Judiciary

In-house Procedure for Judicial Misconduct

Writing Stats

270

Total words

12

Paragraphs