Analyze the transformation of the G7 from a symbol of Western strategic unity to a forum marked by internal contradictions. How should India navigate this changing dynamic to advance its strategic interests? (Answer in 150 words)
Main Body
For three years and few, India has been a special guest invited to the G7 Summit.
G7 most industrialised nation facts:
G7 as a forum marked by internal contradiction:
1. Disagreement on Israel-Palestine issue (France recognised state of Palestine, UK-USA support)
2. US-UK fissures, UK withdrawal from EU.
3. Rise of right-wing sentiment in Italy and Germany - anti-refugee.
4. Bitterness of France towards UK and US after AUKUS and botched submarine deal.
India navigating changing dynamic for strategic interests:
1. Use role as that of a 'middle-power' (between global south and global north)
Maintain strategic autonomy, deal individually - eg: India France, India VS
2. Push for global south equity - for more inclusive institutions.
3. Push for global south equity - for more inclusive institutions.
4. Bilateral trade deals - eg: UK-India FTA, BITA; push for EUFTA.
5. Maintain neutral stance as vis-a-vis: By Role talks facilitated
6. Kill leadership vacuum.
7. Ensure integration: eg: development of IMEC
8. Ensure continuity in diplomacy - even during ongoing polycrisis.
Conclusion
Thus, India as a 'south-western' power should push for rules based order and fairness.
14 words
- Identifies key internal contradictions within G7
- Uses contemporary geopolitical examples
- Connects to India's special guest status
- Analyzes multiple dimensions of G7 fissures
- Provides concrete strategic recommendations
- Balances between engagement with developed and developing nations
- Identifies specific trade mechanisms (FTA, BITA, EUFTA)
- Emphasizes diplomatic continuity and leadership
Bhavika Chopra
Effect of Policies of Developed/Developing Countries and Indian Diaspora
International Relations
G7 and India's Strategic Position
206
Total words
11
Paragraphs