Question Q.15GS2GS2

Critically examine the 'in-house procedure' adopted by the Apex Court to inquire into allegations of misconduct against judges of constitutional courts in India.

Introduction

The recent incident of Justice Verma (allegation of the corruption as cash found in home) has brought back the judicial accountability into the front. The 16th Lok Sabha and the urgency [16th Lok Sabha] as well saw

37 words

Main Body

The recent incident of Justice Verma (allegation of the corruption as cash found in home) has brought back the judicial accountability into the front.

[In-house] Procedures

Procedures the Apex Court to (inquire) allegation(s) of misconduct

Supreme court has made rules on in house mechanism to investigate the cases involving judges

It is often outside the patrimonial notary mechanism under the RJC and 212

Deal with cases of the supreme court and high court judges

Rooted in the principle of Judicial accountability.

1EFficiency → as the recent case on (Justice Verma) - taken up by the (in-house) committee

This procedure ensures a better responsible judicial system.

2It ensured that adequate measures taken against the corrupt judge

However

1The procedure don't address case against the CJI himself (as the issue of judge becoming the allege and he himself (take the case))

2'Ranjan Gogoi' case of allegation

3The mechanism → often seen as an escape route, justice suffering → resigned after the in house report before impeach ment → avoiding the legal accountability.

Issue) with the effectivenessas no can cycle action taken

The mechanismoften seen as an escape route, justice sufferingresigned after the in house report before impeach mentavoiding the legal accountability.

1Issues with the check and balance principle of parliamentary powers

often [blackbox] Syndromeas no official judicial accountability disc loses

Transparent judicial Imbue system (statatory backing) revive the Judicial accountability bill which targets in previous legislature and judicial independence [keep]

As, Former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar said - Judicial Independence is dependent on accountability; its the (keep)

ensuring the idea of Good Governance - by focusing on efficiency

cross-state comparison for relative development understanding

facilitating the Global Investment summit - (e) Gujarat Investment Summit

Other NITI Aayog mitigation measures for federal and overall national development:

1Attal Tinkare Index

2'Davpan' parity

3Energy manual on the bio fuel

1(Non-cooperation) from some state

2No statutory backing

3No enforcement power

Thus, in this 10th anniversary of (NITI Aayog) it should be empowered to act as a (catalyst) of (NITI) thrust.

The 16th Lok Sabha and the urgency [16th Lok Sabha] as well saw a vacancy in the Deputy's Speaker's post, raising concerns over the non-implementation of the constitutional directive.

2Issue with the effectiveness - a) No Cou cycle action taken

3The mechanism → often seen as an Escape route → as Justice Sunyatha resigned after the Inhame report before impeachment → avoiding the real accountability

4Issues with the check and balance principle of parliamentary powers

5often blackbox syndrome → as no artificial judicial accountability discloses

0Transparent judicial Inhame system (statute backing) Way ahead) (2) Revive the Judicial accountability veil which tapped in previous legislation

3Ensure that tapped in previous legislation the accountability system (Rtin) with Judicial Independence

As former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar said 'Judicial independence is an important by the accountability is its (kept) importance

499 words26 paragraphs

Conclusion

As, Former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar said - Judicial Independence is dependent on accountability; its the (keep)

17 words

Diagram

Flow diagram showing NITI Aayog mitigation measures branching into three main categories: (1) Attal Tinkare Index, (2) Davpan parity, and (3) Energy manual on bio fuel. A second diagram shows challenges: (1) Non-cooperation from some states, (2) No statutory backing, (3) No enforcement power.

ensures accountability
takes action against corrupt judges
efficient
responsible judicial system
Good governance focus
Cross-state comparison mechanism
Investment promotion
Identifies multiple dimensions of accountability issues
Connects judicial independence with accountability
References constitutional authority

Open original scan

Page 33

Topper

MOHAMMED ASHMIL SHAH

AIR 3822025

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups

Judiciary

In-house Procedure for Judicial Accountability

Writing Stats

553

Total words

Paragraphs

formal and analytical

Tone