With multipronged strategy of the Central and State Governments, especially in the last few years, the Naxalite problem has been resolved to a large extent in the affected states of the country. However, there are a few pockets in certain states where the naxalite problem still persists, mainly due to the involvement of foreign countries. Rohit is posted as SP (Special Operations) for the last one year, in one of the districts which is still affected by the naxalite problem. The district administration has taken a lot of developmental works in the recent past in the naxalite-affected areas to win the hearts and minds of the people. Over a period of time, Rohit has established an excellent intelligence source that about two hundred naxalites were hiding in a particular village with sophisticated weapons. Without wasting any time, Rohit reached the target village with his team and laid out a footproof cordon and started carrying out a systematic search. During the search, his team managed to overpower all the naxalites along with their automatic weapons. However, in the meantime, more than a hundred tribal women surrounded the village and started marching towards the target house. They were shouting and demanding the immediate release of insurgents since they are their protectors and saviors. The situation on the ground was becoming very critical as the tribal women were extremely agitated and aggressively charging towards them. Rohit tried to contact his superior officer (IG Special Operations) on the mobile phone, but failed to do so due to poor connectivity. Rohit was in great dilemma since out of the naxalites apprehended, two were not only hardcore top insurgents with prize money of ₹10 lakhs on their heads, but were also involved in a recent ambush on the security forces. However, if he did not release the naxalites, the situation could get out of control since the tribal women were aggressively charging towards them. In that case, to control the situation, Rohit might have to resort to firing, which may lead to valuable loss of lives of civilians and would further complicate the situation. a. What are the options available with Rohit to cope with the situation? b. What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Rohit? c. Which of the options, do you think, would be more appropriate for Rohit to adopt and why? d. In the present situation, what are the extra precautionary measures to be taken by the police in dealing with women protesters? (20 marks, 250 words)

polluted cities , it feels as if we have paid no heed to Gandhi jis advice

Environment

(Stakeholders)

True Guide Local Administrator

(A)

(I) Violation of fundamental duties (CA-51(A)) protecting the environment & heritage of India.

(II) lack of character development and wisdom among tourists

(b) Integrating ethical tourism into policies

(I) Adoption of body of ethics for tourists & non binding

(II) Adhering to 'limited tourism' - in lieu with carrying capacity

(III) Label SRs administered started from based tourism

(IV) Violation of rights of locals - who have to bear brunt of tourists pollution

(b) Integrating ethical tourism into policies

(I) Adoption of body of ethics for tourists & non binding

(II) Adhering to 'limited tourism' - in lieu with carrying capacity

(III) Label SRs administered started from based tourism

(C) Course of Action to balance environmental responsibility with Individual rights

(I) Assessment stage

(a) Induced through prioritisation of main areas where body clash

(II) Study best practises around is world regarding balance of individual & environmental site

(III) Action stage

(I) Inclusion of new fundamental duty of tourists & non binding

(II) Adhering to 'limited tourism' - in lieu with carrying capacity

(III) Label SRs administered started from based tourism

(III) Appointment of independent body under ministry of tourism to draft a unique ethical tourism code

(IV) Promotion of 'green tourism' - spiritualised tourism scheme (Rashtriya combined with electric vehicles - i) Visiting news

(C) Course of Action to balance environmental responsibility with individual rights

(I) Assessment stage

(a) Induced through prioritisation of main areas where body clash

(II) Study best practises around is world regarding balance of individual & environmental site

(III) Action stage

(I) Inclusion of new fundamental duty of tourists & non binding

(II) Adhering to 'limited tourism' - in lieu with carrying capacity

(III) Label SRs administered started from based tourism

(IV) District team or local protection names

(V) Helmsman vs Democracy

ii. Naxalism is the greatest threat to India's national security ' (Manmohan Singh)

However due to proactive governance measures naxalite deaths & causalities have reduced by more than half to the past decade. However certain capitals still remain.

(b)

(i) Natural security vs security of tribal woman

(ii) Apprehending hardcore criminals with bounty on them against upholding rule of law & gaining local trust

(iii) Use of force against a non-armed women protesters

(iv) Adhering to rule of law and respect of proportionality

(III) Approaching tribal woman without weapons and with living women superordinate may facilitate

(IV) 2 be with dialogue of Proportionality

(a)

(I) Create Code of Conduct & standard operating procedure for dealing with women protesters

(II) Form a team of female relief control from and training them,

(III) Ensure Allegiance training to SHOs to ease them to deal with such cases

(IV) Use of any lethel & low impact alternatives like tear codes (Cannon it situation gets off hand

(V) Taking extra Care to haunt manehandling of any protestor.

This there is a need to balance need of public Order with protecting dignity & women