Question 14GS2GS2
Also recently clarified that a mechanism should be ensured to bring equality in removal of CCEC & EC. led CEC has security of Tenure but ECs have not. Why such inference needed? → Identify politics-paraya (eg Akhilam Singh case) → violation of MCC & RPA-1957 (Structural issues) → No qualifications of CEC & EC mentioned in constitution (text empowering status impolitely) Supreme court plays important role and does complete justice to it often (Art 142)
Introduction
Also recently clarified that a mechanism should be ensured to bring equality in removal of CCEC & EC.
18 words
Main Body
Also recently clarified that a mechanism should be ensured to bring equality in removal of CCEC & EC.
led CEC has security of Tenure but ECs have not.
Why such inference needed:
Identify politics-paraya (eg Akhilam Singh case)
violation of MCC & RPA-1957
Structural issues
No qualifications of CEC & EC mentioned in constitution (text empowering status impolitely)
Supreme court plays important role and does complete justice to it often (Art 142)
76 words2 paragraphs
Conclusion
Supreme court plays important role and does complete justice to it often (Art 142)
14 words
- Identifies structural inequality in EC tenure
- Cites specific case example (Akhilam Singh)
- References relevant constitutional articles and legislation
- Highlights vulnerability to political interference
Topper
Anjali Ajay Thakur
AIR 432023
Subject & Paper
GS2GS2
Topic
Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups
Election Commission Structure and Judicial Oversight
Equality in Removal Process of EC Commissioners
Writing Stats
108
Total words
2
Paragraphs
critical and analytical
Tone