Question Q.4Assess and describeGS2GS2
Assess the effectiveness of Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 in resolution of water disputes. Also describe the potential impact of delays in resolution of water disputes. (10 marks, 150 words)
Introduction
Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 outlines procedure and appoints tribunal to resolve inter-state river water disputes. Eg: Mahadayi Tribunal, Cauvery Tribunal.
22 words
Main Body
Analysis of effectiveness:
Pros:
Resolution by Dialogue and conversation
Prevent debate in politicized environment.
Resolution outside scope of Judiciary without delay.
Cons:
Only 4 tribunals have delivered awards
Time of decades to decide the award.
States not honouring the award of tribunal.
Impact of delay in settlement:
1Livelihood: Drinking Water/Irrigation water to riparian states impacted.
2Politicization: Used by political leaders to draw votes during elections without evidence.
3Erosion of Trust: Trust in dispute settlement architecture reduces which leads to disobeying culture.
4Economic: Federal Disputes and Economic Blockade also deter Industrial Investment in region.
5Regionalism: Entrench regional sentiment in the population → clashes, riots etc.
ReformSingle Tribunal, Time bound, Compulsory honouring of award
Use River Linking to resolve dispute.
131 words3 paragraphs
Conclusion
Peaceful resolution of Federal Disputes key to stable polity and flourishing economy.
12 words
- Clear pros-cons structure
- Relevant tribunal examples
- Comprehensive impact analysis
- Reform suggestions
Topper
ADITYA HRIDAY UPADHYAY
2023
Subject & Paper
GS2GS2
Topic
Functions and Responsibilities of the Union and the States
Issues and Challenges Pertaining to the Federal Structure
Inter-State River Water Disputes
Writing Stats
165
Total words
3
Paragraphs