Critically analyse the efficacy of linguistic reorganization of states in addressing the reasons for linguistic divides in post-independence India. (10 marks, 150 words)
Introduction
Linguistic reorganization of state emerged after Fazl Ali Committee recommendation.
10 words
Main Body
Efficacy for addressing linguistic divides:
Successes | Limitations
① Provides regional autonomy - by Tamilnadu & Andhra. - by Maharashtra & Gujarat. | ① fueled state-state dispute - by water dispute
② Better opportunities for employment for locals. | ② appeasement of rights of linguistic minorities (Article 360B - officer-added)
③ lead to emergence of regionalism in form of territorial conflicts - by Brijam b/o MU & Kat
② Better opportunities for employment for locals.
Successes | Limitations
① Development of regional language | ① fueled state-state dispute - by water dispute
② Better opportunities for employment for locals. | ② appeasement of rights of linguistic minorities (Article 360B - officer-added)
③ led to emergence of regionalism in form of territorial conflicts - by Brijam b/o
Austere, long-decline organization strengthened federalism that feel to emergence of coalition politics post 1967.
Today, there is need to heed to Kothari Commission 3-language formula in line with NEP 2020.
Diagram
Two-column table showing Successes and Limitations of linguistic reorganization
- Uses Fazl Ali Committee as reference
- Attempts two-sided analysis
- Mentions specific states
- Good structure with success and limitation columns
Rishabh Choudhary
Post-independence Consolidation and Reorganization
Post-independence Consolidation and Reorganization within the country
Linguistic reorganization of states
166
Total words
11
Paragraphs
critical-analytical
Tone