PG

Prajnanandan Giri

Question 1DiscussGS2GS1

There is a need to resolve the ambiguity in the disqualification provisions under section 8 of the Representation of People Act 1951. Discuss.

Open scan (p.4)

Introduction

Section 2 under RPA Act 1951 provides for disqualification of a legislator for various reasons.

15 words

Main Body

Ambiguity -

1. 2 year-jail termleads to disqualification ⊣ if stayed convictionthen reinstatement (However the provision is not mentioned clearly)
2. Practices like false affidavit, non-declaration of assetNot declared as cause for disqualification.
3. No power to ECI to take strong actionleaves it with Judiciary.

Way forward -

1. Need to resolve the ambiguity with amendments in RPA 1951

2. Dinesh Goswami Committeeto include electoral offences and corrupt practices as cause of disqualification.

3. Clear provision on jail-term and subsequent disqualification

4. ⊣ For stay/commutation of sentence

4. In the way, clear provisions all needed under RPA 1951 to prevent criminalization of politics as per Lily Thomas case guidelines.

119 words9 paragraphs

Topper

Prajnanandan Giri

Subject & Paper

GS2GS1

Topic

Constitutional and Political Processes

Electoral Processes

Disqualification of legislators

Writing Stats

134

Total words

9

Paragraphs