धर्म में विश्वास, धर्म में आस्था और संवैधानिक नैतिकता के मध्य तनाव/संघर्ष हो रा करने से व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रा में बिना के प्रश्न उठता है। Discuss the role of the judiciary in navigating the tension between the right to religion and constitutional morality in India in recent times. Refer to relevant case laws. (150 words, 10 marks)
Introduction
Article 25 to 28 of the Indian constitution provide for right to religion which states that a person has right to freely profess and propagate and practice their religion. Constitutional morality refers to the morality derived from the various provisions of the constitution.
43 words
Main Body
Tensions between Right to Religion and Constitutional Morality:
(eg) Movement of procession in certain areas restricted.
Religious practice may discriminate against people of certain caste or gender.
Judiciary role in navigating these tensions :-
Judi ciary has time and again maintained the supremacy of constitutional morality over light to religion.
The constitutional morality has helped in ensuring that fundamental human rights take precedence over religious established morals.
Conclusion
The constitutional morality has helped in ensuring that fundamental human rights take precedence over religious established morals.
17 words
- Defines constitutional morality clearly
- References specific constitutional articles (25-28)
- Identifies key tension points between rights
- Provides concrete example of procession restriction
Aditya Agarwal
Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Morality
Right to Religion vs Constitutional Morality
Judiciary's role in balancing religious freedom and constitutional morality
210
Total words
7
Paragraphs
2
Bullets
Analytical and structured
Tone