Explanation

In D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar (1987), the Supreme Court dealt with the Bihar Governor's repeated repromulgation of 256 ordinances — some kept alive for up to 14 years without ever being placed before the legislature. The Court held this practice a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of the democratic legislative process under Article 213. The case therefore concerns the Governor's power to repromulgate ordinances (option A). It has nothing to do with appointing a Chief Minister, the pardoning power, or revising MLAs' emoluments. Hence option A.